Entrepreneurship Knowledge Network

A few thoughts on Twitter

0 Comment read

I have been on twitter for two months and a few days. Who would have thought that constraining people exchanging thoughts to 140 characters would become such a successful business model? Twitter was founded less than six years ago. And what comes next? Up to 14 seconds’ videos or 140 pixel pictures?

// information, knowledge, wisdom

In a time of increasing information where knowledge competes with information, we need mechanisms to strive for knowledge and wisdom. Or to speak with Eliot: “Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?” Twitter constraints the number of characters but neither the number of posts nor the number of people we follow –  nor, of course, the time spent on Twitter. We may still end up in a net of over-information. Yes, tweeted information is now edited and concise, but it often becomes merely subdivided and two tweets substitute one other message somewhere hidden amongst other tweets.

// being an architect. 

What is fascinating is that we became to some extent the architect of our own information channels. We choose who to follow. This brings some freedom of information as well as flexibility to create our own information. Each of us has his customized newspaper and news channel. The media, the fourth power, in the hand of the people? Not quite, yet social media is powerful.

This new power brings responsibility which a society needs to reflect upon on a macro level: Are we well equipped to be the engineers of our own information streams? How do we educate ourselves to be prepared for the challenge to act as our own architects and the architects of our own surroundings? And what do these information structures make of us? Who creates these structures? And why?

// the strange

On a micro level, we need to constantly review our own thoughts as well as the structures we create around ourselves which shape these thoughts. We should look out for the non-obvious, the strange. So my advice: follow the strange from time to time, be shocked by what is out there outside our own comfort zone, in order to reflect on this comfortable turf we create around ourselves and in which explanation appears sometimes so simple. Let’s shake up our information syllabus and break out of  our very own information channels.

Entrepreneurship Network Sustainability Zahnräder Network

Social Incubator for Social Entrepreneurship

0 Comment read

// New core team

This month the new core team, a fascinating group of people from various socio-cultural, regional and academic backgrounds, will continue what its predecessor has started. Zahnräder is almost two years old and over sixty people actively engage in the network’s organisation in various working and functional groups. Its mission can be conceptualized as a social incubator providing human, social, financial and cultural capital to social entrepreneurs. It is an enabling and encouraging platform acting as an uncle-doctor (or aunt) substitution system. More here.

// Energy -> movement -> social innovation

Zahnräder transforms individual energy into collective movement. Together, the Räder – wheels or gears – create change in and for society. The Zahnräder Network attempts to encourage as well as enable efficient and effective interaction by equipping its participants with knowledge to fish rather than the fish itself. And it provides a place – on- and offline – for structured interaction to contribute to a socially sustainable, innovative and multifaceted society.

Turkey

Turkey in the world – between continuity & change

0 Comment read

Just returned from a talk by the current Turkish Ambassador to the UK. The event was under Chatham House Rules, hence I will not be able to report from it. But I will use this and previous events in the last couple of weeks as an anchor for some reflections on Turkish Foreign Policy.

// A rising power…

Last week Davutoglu, Babacan, Boris Johnson and Jack Straw gave some interesting speeches at a dinner in London. The overall tone was clear: Turkey is a rising regional if not global power. It is the 16th biggest economy in the world with phenomenal stable growth figures currently approximately at around 8% per annum. Erdogan is a leader empowered with all three Weberian forms of authority, namely traditional, rational-legal and charismatic. And Davutoglu is a professor who can and successfully puts into practice his academic foreign policy theory.

// …in the making

Now, not everything is rosy. Turkey still faces various internal struggles and has not zero problems with all its neighbours. It needs the growth to employ its phenomenally young labour force. And it is still in a process of finding its own identity with regard to its own history internally and vis-à-vis its neighbours externally.

// …in the middle

Yet, with a political and economic crisis in Europe, an uprising in the MENA region and a strengthening of the East, Turkey has a unique role. It is not only geographically but also in many ways culturally at the crossroads, right in the middle – and that so from the very beginning, whether that is through its Hellenistic, Roman-Byzantine, Seljukian or Ottoman heritage, to name a few. In a time where extremes merge, one might want to look to Turkey to perceive an experiment of a global melting pot – not through migration, but through its position in time and place.

// Whither to go

At the event last week, Jack Straw said that Turkey is now recognized as equal, which ipso facto implies it was not before. Europe’s policies are or at least should take this into considerations. Turkey may end up at the wrong side of the balance sheet and become a liability to an increasingly introverted Europe, rather than an asset. Meanwhile Turkey’s diaspora builds various cultural, social and economic institutions around the world. Turkey’s new ministry reaches out to them at events like the one just a couple of weeks ago in Berlin celebrating 50 years since the beginning of the guestworker agreement. And next weekend a global entrepreneurship summit takes place in Istanbul, as a follow-up to the one intitiated by Obama.

Turkey’s role is changing. And this is not only due to its current politico-economic strength but rather a simple stock market like calculation. A company thereby is valued as the sum of its discounted future cash flow. A rising Turkey will become more influential in the future and by that very fact becomes increasingly influential in the present. And this is enacted in practice. Fascinating.

This post was also published by “Politics in Spires” here.

Consulting Sustainability

The Boston Consulting Group – a green experience

1 Comment read

// Damals – a long time ago

Some years ago before I started at BCG full-time, I was Visiting Associate in Munich focusing on sustainability and on how to capture the green advantage for consumer companies. The report I was involved in was published a couple of months later.

Für Perspektive Unternehmensberatung schrieb ich damals einen Erfahrungsbericht. Angenehmes Lesen:

// Davor – Drei Gespräche

24 Stunden. So lange dauerte es, bis ich eine Antwort auf mein Anschreiben mit Lebenslauf und Online-Fragebogen erhielt. Einen Monat später flog ich nach München zum Auswahltag. Drei Interviews lagen vor mir in einem der größten Büros der Boston Consulting Group weltweit. Das erste Gespräch hatte ich mit einem Projektleiter. Darauf folgte ein Interview auf Englisch mit einem französischen Consultant, das letzte war wieder auf Deutsch. Etwa 20 Minuten sprachen wir über mich und die Welt, in der restlichen Zeit behandelten wir jeweils einen Case. Zum Beispiel sollte ich abschätzen, wie hoch der Umsatz eines bestimmten neuartigen Produkts sein könnte. Abends kam schon die Zusage per Anruf.

// Dabei – Excel, PowerPoint und Fußball

Mit einer Führung durchs Haus inklusive kurzer Schulung in der IT begann mein erster Tag als Visiting Associate (VA), wie die Praktikanten bei BCG heißen. Den Laptop, das Handy und die UMTS-Karte in der Tasche, ging es gegen Mittag zu meinem Team. Einen Monat zuvor hatte ich bereits in einem Zwei-Tages-Seminar eine Einführung ins Beraterleben erhalten. Im Grunde aber sollte es ein Learning-on-the-Job sein. Man denkt, handelt, fragt, lernt, denkt weiter, handelt weiter, bis man erneut Hilfe braucht. Das können Stunden oder Tages- oder Wochenintervalle sein. Im Grunde ist es wie im Zen-Kloster. Stellt man dann nur noch die schwierigeren Fragen – und braucht man damit die anderen nicht mehr stellen – wird man so ungefähr alle zwei Jahre befördert. Doch natürlich weiß der Zen-Meister respektive Projektleiter, ob man etwas wirklich verstanden hat oder nur verheimlicht.

Am zweiten Wochenende ging es für mich gleich nach Zürich auf das internationale Fußballturnier von BCG. Da steht man dann mit einem Projektleiter aus Tokio, einem Berater aus Mumbai oder einem Partner aus Frankfurt am Main auf dem Platz. Sogar der CEO von BCG trat kurz auf. Gegen seine Mannschaft verlor unser Team dann auch. Warum wohl?

Zurück in München, erhielt ich meine Visitenkarten. In den acht Wochen sah ich neben dem Münchener Büro auch das Hamburger, Berliner und Düsseldorfer Büro. Jedes Büro hat neben der BCG-typischen Lockerheit auch seine Eigenarten, was sich irgendwie gut mit dem europäischen Motto „Einheit in Vielfalt“ beschreiben lässt. In das Berliner Büro habe ich an einem Freitag hineingeschnuppert. In Hamburg hatte ich mein Abschlussgespräch. In Düsseldorf fand das VA-Dinner statt. Einige Wochen später – genau eine Woche vor Abschluss meines Praktikums – trafen wir dann in Mainz zum VA-Summit zusammen und erfuhren, was man bei BCG sonst so machen kann. BCG organisiert z. B. das Schulprojekt business@school, bei dem Schulklassen u. a. unternehmerisches Denken erlernen.

Tagsüber und manchmal auch bis in die Nacht hinein befasste sich unser Team mit einer Studie. Das Team bestand aus einem Projektleiter, einer Beraterin und einem Berater. Der Projektleiter hatte vor allem eine Art Rahmenfunktion. Er gab einerseits die grobe Linie vor, andererseits arbeitete er am Feinschliff. Die beiden Kollegen und ich agierten ansonsten selbstständig, indem wir teils gemeinsam, teils einzeln Analysen tätigten und die Ergebnisse auswerteten, um diese dann abzustimmen und zu diskutieren.

Meine Hauptaufgabe war es, die Erstellung einer großen Umfrage in neun Ländern zu unterstützen, die Daten auszuwerten und in verschiedene Dokumente einzuarbeiten. Hierzu nutzte ich hauptsächlich die Statistik- und Analyse-Software SPSS, Excel und natürlich PowerPoint für die Präsentation. Das Konsumentenverhalten einer bestimmten Branche wurde analysiert, um zu erkennen, wie Konsumenten denken und handeln. Wir betrachteten und bewerteten aber auch Unternehmen und ihre Tätigkeiten, sodass wir ein umfassendes Bild von Konsument, Produzent und Gesellschaft entwerfen konnten. Mit diesem konnte BCG schon während meiner Zeit als VA, aber insbesondere nach Abschluss der Studie Unternehmen gezielt ansprechen und Verbesserungspotenziale offenlegen. Zwischendurch erstellten wir auch auf Kunden zugeschnittene Dokumente, die sich auf den für das jeweilige Unternehmen infrage kommenden Sektor in den für das Unternehmen interessanten Ländern inklusive den Mitbewerbern fokussierte. So ist es zum Beispiel für Kunden spannend zu sehen, wie die Zahlungsbereitschaft oder Qualitätswahrnehmung von Konsumenten für einzelne Produktkategorien in den jeweiligen Ländern ist.

Abends ging es in die VA-Wohnung. Manchmal schickten wir noch vorher ein paar Daten heraus, die in Slides gegossen werden mussten. So kam es vor, dass ich auf dem Rückweg nach Hause mit der Grafikabteilung in Südafrika telefonierte, erläuterte, was für Slides wir bräuchten, damit wir dann am nächsten Morgen darauf aufbauen konnten. Natürlich gibt es auch in einigen Büros in Deutschland Grafikabteilungen, die sich um die Aufbereitung von Folien kümmern. Auch auf eine Research-Abteilung konnten wir zurückgreifen. Das Intranet war ebenfalls eine gute Quelle, um Informationen zu recherchieren. Die angesprochene Studie war also Basisarbeit, die einerseits Kompetenz aufbaute und andererseits Beratungsbedarf bei Unternehmen offenlegte. Sie war darüber hinaus einfach interessant, zeigte sie mir doch auf, wie Menschen in den unterschiedlichen Ländern „ticken“.

// Danach – Bäume pflanzen

Nach acht Wochen hieß es dann Abschied nehmen. Ich erhielt ein Päckchen per Post und erfuhr, dass ein Baum für mich gepflanzt worden war. Und auch das kommende Fast Forward Meeting – ein Wochenende, zu dem alle eingeladen werden, die nach ihrem Praktikum ein Jobangebot erhalten haben, steht im Zeichen der grünen Natur. Wir Fast Forwardler werden dabei zu Fast Forwaldlern.

Der Artikel findet sich auch bei e-fellows hier. Einen Artikel über meine Zeit als Summer Trainee bei OC&C wurde ein Jahr zuvor ebenfalls in Perspektive Unternehmensberatung veröffentlicht. Der Text ist hier.

Oxford

University of Oxford I

3 Comments read

Dies ist der erste Teil von vier kurzen Blogposts zur University of Oxford:

I   Oktober 2011: Einleitung: Zwischen Tradition & Moderne
II  Mai 2012: Bewerbung
III Juni 2012: Akademia & Oxonians
IV Juli 2012: Oxford & Islam

// Oxford

Oxford hat knapp 165.000 Einwohner – ungefähr so viele wie das wunderschöne Oldenburg. Die Stadt liegt nord-westlich von London und bildet das sogenannte goldene Dreieck mit London und „the other place“, Erzrivale Cambridge.

Reem Rahman, mit der ich zusammen hier Management studiert habe, hat einen sehr empfehlenswerten Oxford-Guide verfasst.

// Zwischen Tradition & Moderne

Die University of Oxford ist die älteste Universität der englischsprachigen Welt. Viele namhafte Persönlichkeiten haben hier einige Zeit ihres Lebens verbracht. Von zwölf „Heiligen“ über Schriftsteller wie Wilde, Lewis und Tolkien bis hin zu 26 britischen Premierministern wie William Gladstone, Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair und David Cameron.

Sie bietet eine facettenreiche, faszinierende Identität, die Bildung sowie die Liebe zu Bildung förmlich atmet und atmen lässt. Die Universität durchlebt einen dauerhaften Prozess zwischen Kontinuität und Wandel und lebt von und mit ihren seltsam-schönen Traditionen. So werden zu sogenannten High Table Essen wie auch Klausuren oder der förmlichen Immatrikulation im Sheldonian Theatre besondere Trachten angezogen.

Heute Nacht um 2 Uhr versammelten sich Akademiker des Merton College zur jährlichen Zeit-Zeremonie anlässlich der Zeitumstellung: Sie laufen hierbei im Fellow’s Quad rückwärts, um die Integrität des Raum-Zeit Kontinuums zu wahren. Und am 1.Mai versammelt sich der Magdalen College Chor auf dem Magdalen Turm, um zu singen. Um 6 Uhr morgens. Von diesem Turm wurde auch das Foto geschossen – an einem (wie gewöhnlich) bewölkten Tag.

Eine kurze Geschichte der Universität findet sich hier. Spannend finde ich insbesondere die multidisziplinären Forschungsarbeiten z.B. der James Martin 21st Century School zu Themen rundum Gesundheit und Medizin, Energie und Umwelt, Technologie und Gesellschaft sowie Ethik und Governance. Die James Martin 21st Century School umfasst verschiedenste Institutionen wie das Institute for Science, Innovation & Society, wo ich vor zwei Jahren als Affiliate war.

Der nächste Oxford-Post im Mai wird sich dem Bewerbungsprozedere (Kurse, Stipendien, College-Wahl, Deadlines) widmen.

Knowledge Society

people, principles, practices

0 Comment read

The article “How Will You Measure Your Life?” written by Harvard Professor Christensen is worth reading. It is indeed worth reading twice. Christensen worked for BCG and went to Oxford; I guess, I almost had to pick it. But before we start, this is a good question to ponder on: How do we measure our lives? –.

// What to tell others.

His kind of introductory story is about how he does not tell the chairman of Intel what to think but how to think. I believe, this should actually be a fundamental pillar in our education systems and a focus in any kind of relationship: Enable thinking. And the article is written in such a tone.

// Approach to life.

What tools do we have to think about our life? One way is to employ the models we learn, which we normally apply to what is around us and focus on what is inside us.

Christensen looks at life as a resource allocation process: what is your purpose in life? Allocate your resources accordingly. Or what if we look at management differently? An alternative definition could well be, that management is the art of helping people.

// What drives us?

“One of the theories that gives great insight on the first question—how to be sure we find happiness in our careers—is from Frederick Herzberg, who asserts that the powerful motivator in our lives isn’t money; it’s the opportunity to learn, grow in responsibilities, contribute to others, and be recognized for achievements.”

In other words, it is not get, it is give.

// On principles in principle.

“The marginal cost of doing something wrong “just this once” always seems alluringly low. It suckers you in, and you don’t ever look at where that path ultimately is headed and at the full costs that the choice entails. Justification for infidelity and dishonesty in all their manifestations lies in the marginal cost economics of “just this once.””

“The lesson I learned from this is that it’s easier to hold to your principles 100% of the time than it is to hold to them 98% of the time.”

This is the art of being true to oneself – defining values, living values.

// Starting to focus.

“I apply the tools of econometrics a few times a year, but I apply my knowledge of the purpose of my life every day.”

This entails the question: How much time a day do I spend on the things which are really important to me?

Sadly, “[p]eople who are driven to excel have this unconscious propensity to underinvest in their families and overinvest in their careers—even though intimate and loving relationships with their families are the most powerful and enduring source of happiness.”

// The art of being humble.

“And if your attitude is that only smarter people have something to teach you, your learning opportunities will be very limited. But if you have a humble eagerness to learn something from everybody, your learning opportunities will be unlimited. Generally, you can be humble only if you feel really good about yourself—and you want to help those around you feel really good about themselves, too.”

Briefly: Give and want to give, and you will be given. Be humble and you are strong.

// What for?

“I have a pretty clear idea of how my ideas have generated enormous revenue for companies that have used my research; I know I’ve had a substantial impact. But as I’ve confronted this disease [cancer], it’s been interesting to see how unimportant that impact is to me now. I’ve concluded that the metric by which God will assess my life isn’t dollars but the individual people whose lives I’ve touched.”

“Think about the metric by which your life will be judged, and make a resolution to live every day so that in the end, your life will be judged a success.”

In a way, be conscious about your life, define how you want it to be judged and act accordingly. Simply put, but hard to put into practice.

Books

siddhartha – hermann hesse

0 Comment read

Jedes Mal aufs Neue bin ich begeistert von der indischen Dichtung, die so viel Wahrheit enthält. Ein bisschen Siddhartha steckt in uns allen: der Mensch, der strebt: nach Sinn, nach den Fragen der Tiefe, nach ihren Antworten. Und wie Goethe es treffend ausdrückt: „Es irrt der Mensch so lang er strebt.“

// Irren

So irrt Siddhartha – so irren wir – und Siddhartha stellt die rhetorische Frage an seinem Freund, dass es vielleicht so sei, „daß du vor Suchen nicht zum Finden kommst?“ Genauso kann man natürlich vor lauter Ablenkung, dass Irren vernachlässigen.

Die Suche nach den Fragen der Tiefe ist eine sehr persönliche, auch wenn man sie teils gemeinsam begehen kann. Siddhartha meint: „Weisheit ist nicht mittelbar. Weisheit, welcher ein Weiser mitzuteilen versucht, klingt immer wie Narrheit.“ Und: „Wissen kann man mitteilen, Weisheit aber nicht.“ Man jemand den Weg andeuten, tragen müssen einen die eigenen Füße.

// Streben

Es ist faszinierend, wo und wie Siddhartha lernt. Statt sich über scheinbare Hindernisse zu ärgern und sich damit selbst zu quälen, sieht er sie vielmehr als Teil des Weges und Teil des Ziels. Und vielleicht hätte Siddhartha Mark Twain zugestimmt, als er meinte: „I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.“ Das Leben als Ganzes lehrt.

Wir streben nach dem warum wir leben; ein Streben, das uns so tief innewohnt und das einen erquicken lässt, in dem Moment, in dem man ein Quäntchen oder Tröpfchen Faszination vor sich und in sich wahrnimmt, und für einen kurzen Augenblick es ergriffen hat, bevor es einen aus den Händen rinnt – wohl aber seine Spuren hinterlässt.

// Haltbares

Dieses Streben bei gleichzeitigem Innehalten auf dem Weg führt zu reflektierter in sich geruhter Bewegung. Bedachte Schritte, die sich den Fragen der Tiefe annehmen – ohne von ihnen eingenommen zu werden – bewirken ein Innehalten bei Bewegung, welches eine zögernde, angenehme Weile hervorbringt. Durch diese tun sich faszinierende verborgene Spuren auf und lassen so einiges Haltbares erkennen.

Vielleicht ist dies Dichtung, vielleicht Wahrheit.

Network

networking as a changemaker

0 Comment read

I attended a seminar last weekend and spoke together with my wife about „Networking as a Changemaker“. A few thoughts on this in the October blogpost (four hours too early – off to Oxford tomorrow):

// The Micro-side

Networking is a multiplication formula which only works if it is pursued correctly. If you meet someone what do you think? What is your approach for a meeting? Quite a few books are written on this topic but I would like to suggest two points to ponder upon – easily to remember and thereby easily employable.

The first is two have the following three questions in mind: Me? You? We? Or: who am I? Who are you? Who are we? This helps to understand the setting and act accordingly.

And the second set of three questions: What can I do for you or your network? What can you do for my network? And only then lastly: what can you do for me? I believe in this culture of helping others. If this is really about the I – well, it seems that helping others makes me happy. But it also seems to be the right thing.

Btw1: This seems to me to be essentially a very ethical question about our approach to life. How do I treat others? Why do I connect to others? Do I simply focus on my interests or is there more to it than trying to maximize my gains. What am I waking up for? Why do I (inter-)act?

// The Macro-side

Institutionalized networking should encourage and enable networking. It should provide a frame or plattform for the micro-side. According to Podolny and Page (1998), a networked organization is based on trust and reciprocity while a hierarchical organization employs authority. It is “ask” versus “make”.

For Goffee and Jones (1996) a networked culture is based on high sociability and high solidarity. Sociability measures the “sincere friendliness among members of a community”, whereas solidarity measures “a community’s ability to pursue shared objectives quickly and effectively”. If you intend to increase sociability, you should promote the sharing of ideas, interests and emotions by recruiting compatible people, augment social interaction, reduce formality, limit hierarchical differences and act like a friend, setting the example for kindness. If you aim to increase solidarity, you should develop members’ awareness of competitors, establish a sense of urgency, stimulate the will to win and encourage commitment to corporate goals.

Btw2: Again, what an organization does to us and we to it, is a deeply philosophical question about how we approach the institutionalized “us”. Does the macro-side provide the right encouragement and enable the right interaction – done rightly? Organizations may end up measuring and incentivizing the bad? What if the essential is hidden from us? What, how and why do we in our groups, organizations and states encourage and enable certain ways of (inter-)action?

Changemakers are actually bettermakers. They try to do better through change as well as conservation. Bettermakers need the right approach to (inter-)action on the micro-side and an encouraging and enabling macro-side. Let us start yesterday.

Network

networks for social sustainability

3 Comments read

I have just published an article on migazin.de about networks and social sustainability. Networks are described as institutionalized platforms which encourage and enable exchange, interaction and all kinds of transfer. These networks can help us striving for social sustainability.

// An “uncle doctor substitute support system”

The socio-economic or ethnic background should not matter in a meritocratic society. But it does. There simply is a huge discrepancy between what is and what should. This is not socially sustainable. Social sustainability is one of the three pillars of sustainability – next to economic and environmental sustainability. It is all about people, planet and profit – though I don’t think profit captures it. But value does not start with a “p”, does it? But let us focus on people in this blogpost.

Networks have to substitute the missing uncle doctor. People from lower social or educational classes simply have a lower density and access to uncle doctors. Uncle doctor (or aunt doctor) hereby stand for a wise person, who can provide advice and help in all kinds of areas. Networks can act as an “uncle doctor substitute support system”.

// Us & between us

We essentially have us and what is between us: We could call us actors or agents and the between us a system or structure. Or in terms of network theory we have nods, connections and relations. Nodes are stations, connections are rails and the relations are trains travelling on rails between certain stations. We are nods connected to each other with certain kinds of relations.

These networks could and should strive for social sustainability. They key is to allow for changemakers and allow changemakers making change happen. Simplified we have two ingredients. Ingredient one: the person, actor, agent or nod: this entity needs to ask himself two questions: How can I help you? And: how can you help my network? Ingredient two: the system, structure or connections and relations. These need to encourage and enable interaction and exchange. Both together create a willingness and an ability to change.

// How to fish?

How does this look practically? As often: it depends. There are many ways to facilitate this. The goal is the creation of ability on the one hand and the usability on the other hand. The Zahnräder Network attempts to encourage as well as enable efficient and effective interaction by equiping its participants with knowledge to fish rather than the fish itself. And it provides a place – on- and offline – for structured interaction. More on Zahnräder in my blogpost for August.

// Shaping society

Ability and usability can be paired and focused on participating in and for a pluralistic and socially sustainable society. Networks can substitute the uncle doctor and contribute to social sustainability. In this society, no one must have the response – but everyone should feel responsable.

Network

Zahnräder Network

2 Comments read

// Goals

Zahnräder is an organization from Muslims for society. It is an enabling and encouraging platform which provides human, social and financial capital as well as motivation and credibility. The idea is to facilitate, to teach how to fish, not to give fish. Knowledge of all types is transferred – from tacit to explicit, individual to social, declarative, procedural, causal, conditional, relational to pragmatic knowledge. Similarly networks are built and a tertius iungens orientation (Obstfeld, 2005) of trying to connect people from your network with each other encouraged.

I generally ask people when they meet another person to think about two things:

  1. How can I help this person?
  2. How can this person help people in my network?

This is a mentality shift of always attempting to help everyone around you which I experienced in Oxford from so many of my colleagues. It is a wonderful and helpful way of approaching others. And it benefits Zahnräder, too.

Ability Usability
Internal Human Capital Cultural Capital, Motivation
External Social Capital Financial Capital, Credibility

Zahnräder transforms individual energy into collective movement. Together, the Räder – wheels or gears – create change in and for society. We are functioning thereby as a complement, not a substitute to existing organizations – enabling & encouraging changemakers.

// Structure

Currently, over 60 people are involved in the organization of Zahnräder. Communication is primarily online via skype, basecamp and email. We are organized in a matrix-like organization with functional groups on the horizontal and working groups on the vertical axis. Functional groups are inter alia finance, communication and IT. Working groups are the conference team and ZahnräderX local teams.

// The national conference

The national conference is currently the heart of Zahnräder. Over 100 participants come together – all of them as producers and no one just as a consumer. It is all about sharing: sharing knowledge, sharing your network, sharing what drives you, your goals, your ambitions, your vision. Participants speak about their projects, receive feedback, knowledge. Some join projects they encounter some recommend it to their friends.

// Quo vadis?

We managed to shift from a starting phase to a growth phase. We intend to have over 120 Zahnräder involved in the organization primarily by extending our functional and working groups. The idea is to be sustainable internally and provide sustainable services externally. From October onwards, we are aiming to have a Human Resource and from December onwards an Internal Communication functional group. Also, we plan to establish a Zahnräder think tank.